<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>desgrange.net &#187; vorbis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.desgrange.net/tag/vorbis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.desgrange.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Killing Flash</title>
		<link>http://blog.desgrange.net/2009/06/15/killing-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.desgrange.net/2009/06/15/killing-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[codec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vorbis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.desgrange.net/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, not that one: (Photo from Cryptonaut used under CC license) I&#8217;m talking about Adobe&#8216;s Flash. Like a lot of people, I don&#8217;t like that technology at all (for building internet websites). It&#8217;s a proprietary software with all the usual drawbacks (you don&#8217;t know what the software does, you are not allowed to find out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not that one:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.desgrange.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flash_character.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-959" title="flash_character" src="http://blog.desgrange.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/flash_character.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a> (<a hreflang="en" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cryptonaut/2122147267/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.flickr.com/photos/cryptonaut/2122147267/?referer=');">Photo from Cryptonaut used under CC license</a>)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Systems" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Systems?referer=');">Adobe</a>&#8216;s <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash?referer=');">Flash</a>.</p>
<p>Like a lot of people, I don&#8217;t like that technology at all (for building internet websites). It&#8217;s a proprietary software with all the usual drawbacks (you don&#8217;t know what the software does, you are not allowed to find out what it does, you can&#8217;t use an alternative software for playing Flash content, you are tight to Adobe&#8217;s fate). You should know that Flash is installed on something like 99% of computers, much more than Microsoft Windows, so it&#8217;s a very interesting target for pirates, <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28695" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.securityfocus.com/bid/28695?referer=');">a security flaw in Flash player (and it already happens)</a> is a very good opportunity for a cross-platform virus/malware.</p>
<p>So it has nothing to do on an open web. Read more about this in this article: <a hreflang="en" href="http://trombonechamp.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/when-you-see-flash-duck-and-cover/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/trombonechamp.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/when-you-see-flash-duck-and-cover/?referer=');">When you see Flash, duck and cover</a>.</p>
<p>But unfortunately, Flash is used a lot, especially for playing audio and video on a website. Have a look at <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.youtube.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/?referer=');">Youtube</a> or <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.dailymotion.com/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dailymotion.com/?referer=');">Dailymotion</a>.</p>
<p>Even on my blog I have used it for playing videos and songs (for instance in my <a hreflang="en" href="/2008/11/24/Roomba/">Roomba</a> and <a hreflang="en" href="/2009/05/01/OpenBSD-4-5">OpenBSD</a> posts).</p>
<p>For a long time I was hearing about new &#8220;audio&#8221; and &#8220;video&#8221; tags in <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_5" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_5?referer=');">HTML 5</a> specifications. Sounds interesting for building websites using open standards and not depending on Adobe&#8217;s Flash anymore for this usage.</p>
<p>Those of you knowing a bit the world of video/audio <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec?referer=');">codecs</a> may wonder how we can have an &#8220;open standard&#8221; about audio and video. In fact codecs are crippled with patents (a lot of them). Even on HTML 5 specs it&#8217;s written that <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/video.html#video-and-audio-codecs-for-video-elements" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.w3.org/TR/html5/video.html_video-and-audio-codecs-for-video-elements?referer=');">the codecs situation is problematic</a>.</p>
<p>So replacing a closed proprietary technology with patented codecs is not really an improvement.</p>
<p>You might be interesting reading <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=977" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=977&amp;referer=');">why we need open video</a>.</p>
<p>Fortunately, there are some good open source, patent free codecs. On <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.xiph.org" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.xiph.org?referer=');">xiph.org</a> you can find <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogg" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogg?referer=');">ogg</a> multimedia container, the <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis?referer=');">vorbis</a> audio codec and the <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora?referer=');">theora</a> video codec. Vorbis and theora are high quality codecs, but yes, you can find better video codecs than theora, but they all use some patented algorithms.</p>
<p>Few weeks ago <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation?referer=');">mozilla</a> released a beta version of <a hreflang="en" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Firefox?referer=');">Firefox</a> handling those new tags for vorbis and theora content. One of the most used web browser will now be able to play videos that way. The question is &#8220;Will people (webmasters) use this technology?&#8221;. The answer seems to be &#8220;YES&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dailymotion is trying a version of its website using the new HTML5 tags and vorbis and theora codecs. If you have installed Firefox 3.5, you can try it on <a hreflang="en" href="http://www.dailymotion.com/openvideodemo" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.dailymotion.com/openvideodemo?referer=');">Dailymotion demo video</a> or even using <a hreflang="en" href="http://openvideo.dailymotion.com" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/openvideo.dailymotion.com?referer=');">Dailymotion openvideo website</a>.</p>
<p>This is very good news for web&#8217;s future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.desgrange.net/2009/06/15/killing-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

